<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2>In a message dated 27/06/2002 13:15:06 GMT Daylight Time, djb122@y... writes:<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">if Matthew's rung there and<BR>
says they are E I think we can take it as read that they are!<BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<BR>
Ill have to say - all I can remember is that they were a really good resonant ring of 6 - It was a long time ago that I rang there so I would'nt bet on anything!<BR>
<BR>
HBW (1929) states the details to be<BR>
<BR>
1 G Mears 1849 4-0-10<BR>
2 G Mears 1849 4-0-19<BR>
3 G Mears 1849 5-0-24<BR>
4 Warner 1877 6-0-0<BR>
5 Roger Purdue 1664 8-0-0<BR>
6 Roger Purdue 1664 10-0-0 in G.<BR>
<BR>
I think Gilletts had a go at them after this - Ill try ang get over there sometime.<BR>
<BR>
Cheers<BR>
<BR>
Matthew<BR>
</FONT></HTML>