boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0003_01C233BD.49D979E0" ------=_NextPart_001_0003_01C233BD.49D979E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Try the attaached John Baldwin (029) 2055 4457 -----Original Message----- From: Chris Pickford [mailto:c.j.pickford@t...] Sent: 24 July 2002 17:49 To: bellhistorians@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Converting frequencies to notes With all this talk of pitch - and the quantity of information already posted - isn't it time someone produced a list of heavy bells in order of pitch, with weight as a secondary data element. It would make interesting and useful reading. I'm not volunteering this time - but my heavy bells list (on the Keltek site) - should give someone a helpful start Chris P ----- Original Message ----- From: David Bryant To: bellhistorians@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 1:33 PM Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Converting frequencies to notes > And while many people might say "But C sharp is the same as D flat", clearly > some rings of bells are described as one and not the other (e.g. Cripplegate > is D flat). There may be 12 pitches on a piano, but there are 21 on a > violin. The trouble is that there is absolutely no consistency. Some rings are described as one or the other, and some as one only. Db could indicate nearer to D and C# nearer to C, but in practice as far as bells are concerned they seem to by used in a rather arbitrary manner. David This message was sent to you via the Bell Historians' Mailing List. To unsubscribe from the list send an email to bellhistorians-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT This message was sent to you via the Bell Historians' Mailing List. To unsubscribe from the list send an email to bellhistorians-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. ------=_NextPart_001_0003_01C233BD.49D979E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Try=20 the attaached
 
John=20 Baldwin
(029) 2055 4457
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Pickford=20 [mailto:c.j.pickford@t...]
Sent: 24 July 2002=20 17:49
To: bellhistorians@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re:= =20 [Bell Historians] Converting frequencies to notes

With all this talk of pitch - and the qu= antity of=20 information already posted - isn't it time someone produced a list of hea= vy=20 bells in order of pitch, with weight as a secondary data element. It woul= d=20 make interesting and useful reading.
 
I'm not volunteering this time - but my = heavy=20 bells list (on the Keltek site) - should give someone a helpful=20 start
 
Chris P
----- Original Message -----
F= rom:=20 David Br= yant=20
To: bellhistorians@yahoogroups.com=20
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 1:33= =20 PM
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians]=20 Converting frequencies to notes

> And while many people might say "But C sharp is the same = as D=20 flat", clearly
> some rings of bells are described as one and not the othe= r=20 (e.g. Cripplegate
> is D flat). There may be 12 pitches on a piano, but there= are=20 21 on a
> violin.
 
The trouble is that there is absolutely no consistency. Some r= ings=20 are described as one or the other, and some as one only. Db could indic= ate=20 nearer to D and C# nearer to C, but in practice as far as bells are=20 concerned they seem to by used in a rather arbitrary manner.
 
David


This message was sent to you via t= he=20 Bell Historians' Mailing List. To unsubscribe from the list send an ema= il to=20 bellhistorians-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your= use=20 of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.= =20


This=20 message was sent to you via the Bell Historians' Mailing List. To unsubsc= ribe=20 from the list send an email to=20 bellhistorians-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your u= se of=20 Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.=20
------=_NextPart_001_0003_01C233BD.49D979E0--