------=_NextPart_000_02B5_01C5413D.E267EF80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re Thornborough. Eayre & Smith rehung the bells in all new fittings in a ca= st-iron frame. Before that they hung with the NV fittings in a 4 bell frame= adapted for 5. They were certainly shot-blasted to remove rust & muck, the= n painted black with "Waxoyl"; they were not tuned; and as far as I remembe= r they retain their flange heads. So the original weight - as I say quoted = from their original legtters and invoice - can stand, unless anyone knows b= etter. It is a good job. I'm pretty sure the flange tops do remain - whether the original weights ar= e still accurate must depend to some extent on how much the bells have rust= ed! I remember a very cold day several years ago when the Bassaleg bells were s= andblasted. We loaded them into the back of a lorry and they were taken to = a local garage. After being done, they were loaded back into the lorry and = brought back to the industrial unit where they were stored. I have some pho= tos somewhere of them immediately after sandblasting - they are all a dull = grey colour, and not particularly corroded - much of the original surface r= emains. By the time they were again loaded into a lorry and taken to the mu= seum in Sheffield where they now hang, they had regained a patina of rust -= it was only a week or two after sandblasting and they were stored under co= ver, but it was February and very damp. The museum did consider coating the= m with some solution to prevent them rusting, but decided against it. I gather that when hung for ringing they were considered quite good for ste= el bells, but when chimed in their present location they sound absolutely f= oul! David ------=_NextPart_000_02B5_01C5413D.E267EF80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable