------=_NextPart_000_0015_01C57829.5DAF77E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I believe that Dunham Massey were Taylor's second complete ten, predated by= Newark (1842, 2nd recast in 1846). I had a look at the bells at Newark a f= ew months ago. As I recall, the trebles were of a fairly normal shape - not= noticeably long in the waist or tall in the crown, with the tenor being a = rather squat, short-waisted bell. The most extreme Taylor C19 examples I know of where trebles are very long = in the waist and have high domed crowns are the trebles of ten (3&4 of 12) = at St Mary's, Taunton. I have not seem the Institute bells other than in ph= otos and it's difficult to judge, but if anything I think the shape of the = Taunton bells is even more extreme. In the early C20 (i.e. into the true-harmonic era), some Taylor higher-numb= er rings had long-waisted trebles with high crowns, e.g. Redcliffe, where t= he crowns are more Purdue-shaped (i.e. sloping inwards and upwards) than do= med. Doubtless the reason for this was that it created a flat top and made = it easier to attach the bell to a cast iron headstock than a domed top woul= d have done. Slightly later, the tall crowns were dispensed with in favour = of flange tops on the trebles (e.g. York (now removed), Exeter, Worcester, = etc). David ------=_NextPart_000_0015_01C57829.5DAF77E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable