<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3c.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/loose.dtd">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<TITLE>Message</TITLE>
<!-- Network content -->
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1586" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left><FONT
face=Tahoma size=2><BR><BR></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV id=ygrp-text><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff></FONT>
<P><BR><BR>Many thanks to David and George for the additional details. Is it
<BR>possible that the apparent conflict in number of bells supplied in
<BR>1871 might result from combining six new bells with two of the clock
<BR>bells to form an octave chime, with two bells doing double duty with
<BR>the clock?<SPAN class=487133209-26122006><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff> </FONT></SPAN></P>
<P><SPAN class=487133209-26122006></SPAN> </P>
<P><SPAN class=487133209-26122006><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff>Absolutely
not, we have photos of the clock bells AND the separate chime of 8 (via a
relation of Ran Clouston)</FONT> </SPAN></P>
<P><SPAN class=487133209-26122006></SPAN><SPAN
class=487133209-26122006></SPAN><FONT face=Arial><FONT color=#0000ff>G<SPAN
class=487133209-26122006> AD </SPAN></FONT></FONT><BR></P></DIV></DIV><!-- ygrp-msg --><!-- Sponsor -->
<DIV style="CLEAR: both; FONT-SIZE: 1px; COLOR: #fff">.</DIV></DIV><IMG
height=1
src="http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=5029388/grpspId=1707285820/msgId=11419/stime=1167110281/nc1=4299905/nc2=3848500/nc3=3848531"
width=1 NOSEND="1"> <BR><SPAN style="COLOR: white"></SPAN> <!--End group email --></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>