<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3243" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff">
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=023570211-03032008>Upper Beeding has to
be more than a fund raiser.</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=023570211-03032008>The amount it will cost
to remodel will make a huge hole in any cash realised.</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=023570211-03032008>If it was that, surely
the association could raise the likely "profit" and take over ownership of some
of the bells but leave them on "permanent" lone.</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=023570211-03032008>The sum involved would
probably be less than one of the back bells!</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=023570211-03032008>It would not be as much
as some of the BRF grants that HCACR has made, and without any
strings.</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=023570211-03032008>After all a BRF is there
to maintain ringing bells. </SPAN></DIV><BR>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> bellhistorians@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:bellhistorians@yahoogroups.com] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Sue
Marsden<BR><B>Sent:</B> 03 March 2008 11:01<BR><B>To:</B>
bellhistorians@yahoogroups.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Bell Historians] metal
prices<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<TABLE>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD bgColor=#ffffff>*** WARNING ***<BR><BR>This mail has originated
outside your organization,<BR>either from an external partner or the
Global Internet. <BR>Keep this in mind if you answer this message.
<BR></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<DIV id=ygrp-text>
<P>> "Doesn't anyone read the RW these days?! The tower is Upper Beeding in
West Sussex. It's interesting to note that few quarter peals are rung here.
Rehung in 1980 after a 10 year silence."<BR>><BR>> So what is the reason
for getting rid of the trebles?<BR>><BR>> David<BR><BR>The earlier message
saying the front four would be retuned seems to<BR>suggest that it is the 2
tenors which are being got rid of, which<BR>would fetch more
money.<BR><BR>SEM<BR></P></DIV><!--End group email --></BODY></HTML>
<table><tr><td bgcolor=#ffffff><font color=#000000>SELEX Sensors and Airborne Systems Limited<br>
Registered Office: Sigma House, Christopher Martin Road, Basildon, Essex SS14 3EL<br>
A company registered in England & Wales. Company no. 02426132<br>
********************************************************************<br>
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended<br>
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended<br>
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.<br>
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or<br>
distribute its contents to any other person.<br>
********************************************************************<br>
<br>
</font></td></tr></table>