<html><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div>Presumably it is not possible to check this now as the top octaves of the carillon have been recast to a different profile. </div><div><br></div><div>R<br><br>Sent from Richard Offen's iPhone</div><div><br>On 30/10/2010, at 11:13 PM, <a href="mailto:Dwhgodwin@_2jQ6JcliMoM9v2WRzYuW2nO5JujhwmdrSs5w1Lp-d0KVhMveBDSU6guuLnaAPmdAxYbhd8fVgJpmm8.yahoo.invalid">Dwhgodwin@_2jQ6JcliMoM9v2WRzYuW2nO5JujhwmdrSs5w1Lp-d0KVhMveBDSU6guuLnaAPmdAxYbhd8fVgJpmm8.yahoo.invalid</a> wrote:<br><br></div><div><span></span></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<span style="display:none"> </span>
<div id="ygrp-text">
<p><font color="black" size="2" face="arial">W<font color="black" face="arial" size="2">ould 5 7/8" be the strike diameter at the thickest part of the sound bow? would your informant be able to check this?<br>
DG<br>
</font></font></p><font color="black" size="2" face="arial"><font color="black" face="arial" size="2"><div> <br>
</div>
<div> <br>
</div>
<div></div>
<div> <br>
</div>
<div> <br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: arial,helvetica;font-size: 10pt;color: black;">-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Alan Buswell <<a href="mailto:aaj.buswell@7iLOr4-vShR7mpKGfNnY5w_gq66m88aq3wgQzZAFk18c_xYUxdq5fQhd8nkG-MhkbDekppi97axld7WUunsakPNtRcc.yahoo.invalid">aaj.buswell@7iLOr4-vShR7mpKGfNnY5w_gq66m88aq3wgQzZAFk18c_xYUxdq5fQhd8nkG-MhkbDekppi97axld7WUunsakPNtRcc.yahoo.invalid</a>><br>
To: <a href="mailto:bellhistorians@yahoogroups.com"><a href="mailto:bellhistorians@yahoogroups.com">bellhistorians@yahoogroups.com</a></a><br>
Sent: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 15:38<br>
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Riverside Carillon.<br>
<br>
<div id="AOLMsgPart_2_0c426359-03d9-4885-b9bc-f01af5e7faa6">
<span> </span>
<div id="ygrp-mlmsg">
<div id="ygrp-msg">
<div id="ygrp-text">
<div>
</div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">That's precisely what I'm wanting to know. G&J
says diameter is 5 7/8 inches, actual outside measurement, as measured by my
informant - 7 inches. The former measurement being the inside. </font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">AAJB.</font></div>
<blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<div style="font: 10pt arial;">----- Original Message ----- </div>
<div style="font: 10pt arial;"><b>From:</b>
<a title="rodbick@iJ70K8Yoy_xLeS-IzfHGMq1Z6yGVdILkq3rRgOJDHJnmd9e7qm4ceVJRXkRCj4gaBs1ZZhFjvG4FURpTUnb6p0M.yahoo.invalid" href="mailto:rodbick@iJ70K8Yoy_xLeS-IzfHGMq1Z6yGVdILkq3rRgOJDHJnmd9e7qm4ceVJRXkRCj4gaBs1ZZhFjvG4FURpTUnb6p0M.yahoo.invalid">Roderic
Bickerton</a> </div>
<div style="font: 10pt arial;"><b>To:</b> <a title="bellhistorians@yahoogroups.com" href="mailto:bellhistorians@yahoogroups.com"><a href="mailto:bellhistorians@yahoogroups.com">bellhistorians@yahoogroups.com</a></a>
</div>
<div style="font: 10pt arial;"><b>Sent:</b> Saturday, October 30, 2010 3:12
PM</div>
<div style="font: 10pt arial;"><b>Subject:</b> Re: [Bell Historians] Riverside
Carillon.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<span> </span>
<div id="ygrp-text">
<div>
</div>
<div>Hoe very odd, Hoe on earth can you sensibly determine an inside
diameter at the lip the shape being a curve?</div>
<div>sounds an implaudable explanation.</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 24 October 2010 15:46, alanaj8283 <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:aaj.buswell@7iLOr4-vShR7mpKGfNnY5w_gq66m88aq3wgQzZAFk18c_xYUxdq5fQhd8nkG-MhkbDekppi97axld7WUunsakPNtRcc.yahoo.invalid"><a href="mailto:aaj.buswell@7iLOr4-vShR7mpKGfNnY5w_gq66m88aq3wgQzZAFk18c_xYUxdq5fQhd8nkG-MhkbDekppi97axld7WUunsakPNtRcc.yahoo.invalid">aaj.buswell@7iLOr4-vShR7mpKGfNnY5w_gq66m88aq3wgQzZAFk18c_xYUxdq5fQhd8nkG-MhkbDekppi97axld7WUunsakPNtRcc.yahoo.invalid</a></a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);" class="gmail_quote">
<div style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><span> </span>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>My attention has been drawn to the fact that there may be two ways of
measuring a bell's diameter. Bell No.7 of the G&J Riverside Carillon,
weighing only 15lbs, has been measured as 7" (no typo error)on the outside
(lip to lip)but in the G&J Tuning Books it is given as 5 7/8". The
measurements have been checked by my informer and shows the smaller
measurement to be that of the INSIDE of the bell. What of the other bells
here, I wonder?<br>
<br>
Is this the usual practice of Cyril or may be anyone
else?<br>
<br>
AAJB<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
<div style="color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></div>
<div></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div></div>
</div>
<div style="color: rgb(255, 255, 255);height: 0pt;"></div>
</div>
<!-- end of AOLMsgPart_2_0c426359-03d9-4885-b9bc-f01af5e7faa6 -->
</div>
</div></div></font></font>
<p></p>
</div>
<!-- end group email -->
</div></blockquote></body></html>