<html><head></head><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div><br><br>Sent from Richard Offen's iPad</div><div><br>On 03/07/2012, at 11:48 PM, "Peter Rivet" <<a href="mailto:peter@h3Mhe8NrQ1FLXbSRI0Ht2ZjbatXr44l_Cqf57kRXPy0whe51G4FhHvlhGSNbmHsQw1E5tMVdOmUD_YMwtAY.yahoo.invalid">peter@h3Mhe8NrQ1FLXbSRI0Ht2ZjbatXr44l_Cqf57kRXPy0whe51G4FhHvlhGSNbmHsQw1E5tMVdOmUD_YMwtAY.yahoo.invalid</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<span style="display:none"> </span>
<div id="ygrp-text">
<p>
</p><div><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2"><span class="171104115-03072012">Maybe the sixth bell was a sanctus, or at least
something unconnected with the ring? </span></font><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2"><span class="171104115-03072012">My experience
of the Victoria County Histories is that although its authors try very hard
to be accurate they are not generally complied by people with
detailed knowledge of bells. At Whittington in Lancashire they get
the dates of the bells rights but give them the wrong way round, so that the
tenor is recorded as the treble.</span></font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2"><span class="171104115-03072012"></span></font> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2"><span class="171104115-03072012">Peter
Rivet</span></font></div></div></div></div>
<!-- end group email -->
</div></blockquote><br><div>No sanctus mentioned by Owen. </div><div><br></div><div>R</div></body></html>