<html><body style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue',Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 12px;"><p>No, I think it's from the same place that decided 'envision' was a better word than visualise (which is probably spelt with a 'z' there!)! </p>
<p>R<br /><br /></p>
<blockquote><br />----- Original Message -----<br /><div style="width:100%;background:rgb(228,228,228);">
<div style="font-weight:bold;">From:</div>bellhistorians@yahoogroups.com</div><br /><div style="font-weight:bold;">To:</div><bellhistorians@yahoogroups.com><br /><div style="font-weight:bold;">Cc:</div><br /><div style="font-weight:bold;">Sent:</div>Tue, 16 Jul 2013 00:48:52 +0100<br /><div style="font-weight:bold;">Subject:</div>Re: [Bell Historians] ANZAB Festival (RW 2013, p.695)<br /><br /><br /><span> </span>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p>At 23:30 15/07/2013, Richard wrote:<br /><br />>Whilst on the subject of that particular article, I will raise the <br />>thorny topic I have queried before in this forum.<br />><br />>Why has it been felt necessary to invent the new noun, 'carillonist' <br />>for those who play a carillon? The word 'carillonneur' has served <br />>the English language perfectly well for some considerable time, so <br />>what precipitated the desire for this new(ish) invention??<br /><br />Probably a grammatical flight of fancy on the part of some <br />continental onanist (or should that be wankeur?) ...<br /><br />RAL<br /><br /></p></div>
<div style="height:0px;color:#fff;"></div>
</blockquote></body></html>