<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Tony via Bell-historians wrote on
26/01/2022 14:11:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:171840710.3773046.1643206268524@mail.yahoo.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div class="ydpe9b99720yahoo-style-wrap"
style="font-family:verdana, helvetica,
sans-serif;font-size:16px;">
<div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">Yes, I think the musical
interpretation is possibly more plausible.</div>
<div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">From my point of view this
still suggests there were 4 bells in 1641.</div>
<div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">FYI, the 4 old bells that
survived in the tower are Db C Bb Ab.</div>
<div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">But, only the treble and 3rd
were cast before 1641.</div>
<div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">After hearing the 'music', I
think the '1' as treble was more pleasing.</div>
<div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">If anyone is interested in
the seeing a picture then I can share one.</div>
<div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">Tony</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Here is the tune again in both versions, first with treble as 1,
then with tenor as 1.</p>
<p>And an audio (mp3) file with the two versions in the same order.</p>
<p>Here is a link to the two files for those who use the Digest and
don't receive attachments.</p>
<p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.dropbox.com/sh/thvifqedvq2ti48/AACmv_BJiQlTGZZrGBej3Euea?dl=0">https://www.dropbox.com/sh/thvifqedvq2ti48/AACmv_BJiQlTGZZrGBej3Euea?dl=0</a><br>
</p>
<p>Have made lots of assumptions, e.g. that notes are all the same
length and that tuning is diatonic.</p>
<p>Hayden Charles<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>