<div dir="ltr">Unusually, Pealbase didn't pick up the correction. Though I missed it as well.<div><br></div><div>Sue</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, 10 Sept 2026 at 17:08, Richard Smith via Bell-historians <<a href="mailto:bell-historians@lists.ringingworld.co.uk">bell-historians@lists.ringingworld.co.uk</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><br>
<br>
On Thu 10/09/2026 17:00, Richard Johnston via Bell-historians wrote:<br>
> Rugby peal:<br>
> <br>
> There is a correction notice on page 694 (March 11th) of Bell News<br>
<br>
The seems pretty conclusive:<br>
<br>
"The peal of Double Norwich rung at Rugby by members of the St. Andrew's <br>
Society, was rung on Saturday, Feb. 18th, not on Wednesday, January <br>
18th, as published."<br>
<br>
RAS<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Bell-historians mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Bell-historians@lists.ringingworld.co.uk" target="_blank">Bell-historians@lists.ringingworld.co.uk</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/listinfo/bell-historians" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/listinfo/bell-historians</a><br>
</blockquote></div>