<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">Philip wrote:</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><span style="font-size:12.8px">> More generally, I do think the CC Methods Committee would</span></div><div class="gmail_extra"><span style="font-size:12.8px">> perform a useful </span><span style="font-size:12.8px">service if they actually listed in their online</span></div><div class="gmail_extra"><span style="font-size:12.8px">> connections (and in a </span><span style="font-size:12.8px">searchable format) some of the original</span></div><div class="gmail_extra"><span style="font-size:12.8px">> names associated with methods.</span><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><span style="font-size:12.8px"><br></span></div><div class="gmail_extra"><span style="font-size:12.8px">I would happily add functionality to add aka names to methods in Composition Library if people could provide me with data.</span></div><div class="gmail_extra"><span style="font-size:12.8px"><br></span></div><div class="gmail_extra"><span style="font-size:12.8px">Regards,</span></div><div class="gmail_extra"><span style="font-size:12.8px"><br></span></div><div class="gmail_extra"><span style="font-size:12.8px">Graham</span></div></div>