<div dir="ltr"><div><div>| I'm guessing that the rows in those 3 new leads are either ones that
would have appeared in the missing 3 leads from base course or else they
have 1,7&8 in a combination that doesn't occur in the base | |course. <br><br></div>I think it's even more sophisticated than that actually. If you look at the rows approaching the course end in Rutland versus in Belvedere:<br></div>Rutland: Belvedere:<br><pre><u>52317486</u> <u>32417586
25134768</u> <u>23145768
21537486</u> <u>21347586
12354768</u> <u>12435768</u>
21<span class="m_1454933698129679451gmail-run">345678</span> 21<span class="m_1454933698129679451gmail-run">345678</span>
12436587 12436587
<span class="m_1454933698129679451gmail-run">12345678 </span><span class="m_1454933698129679451gmail-run">12345678<br><br></span></pre><pre><span class="m_1454933698129679451gmail-run">Then you've got a 3-way rotation in Belvedere against Rutland -> <br>So every time a course ends B instead of TWR that fixes two other courses that must also so end (24536 and 25346 in the case of the plain course). <br></span></pre><pre><span class="m_1454933698129679451gmail-run">I think there are 7 such courses per part as follows:<br></span></pre><pre><span style="font-family:monospace,monospace"><span class="m_1454933698129679451gmail-run">5xx6x<br>5x6xx</span></span><span class="m_1454933698129679451gmail-run"><span style="font-family:monospace,monospace"><br>56xxx</span></span><br><br><span style="font-family:monospace,monospace"><span class="m_1454933698129679451gmail-run"><span style="font-family:monospace,monospace"><span class="m_1454933698129679451gmail-run">6xx5x</span></span></span></span><br><span style="font-family:monospace,monospace"><span class="m_1454933698129679451gmail-run"><span style="font-family:monospace,monospace"><span class="m_1454933698129679451gmail-run"><span style="font-family:monospace,monospace"><span class="m_1454933698129679451gmail-run">6x5xx<br></span></span></span></span>65xxx<br></span></span><span class="m_1454933698129679451gmail-run"><span style="font-family:monospace,monospace"><br>6xxx5</span><br><br></span></pre><pre><span class="m_1454933698129679451gmail-run">Which seem to fit into two sets of three and then a final one that is handled by the part end. <br><span style="font-family:monospace,monospace">Some relationship like this might even occur elsewhere in those leads, I guess, although I haven't checked that. </span><br></span></pre><pre><span class="m_1454933698129679451gmail-run">Cheers,<br>Alan<br></span></pre><pre><span class="m_1454933698129679451gmail-run"><br><br></span></pre><pre><span class="m_1454933698129679451gmail-run"><br></span></pre></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 9 August 2017 at 15:04, Alan Reading <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:alan.reading@googlemail.com" target="_blank">alan.reading@googlemail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:rgb(31,73,125)">Roddy - "I
think Pitman worked out that you cannot join 60 courses together with
bobs only in full courses but of course in spliced you can ring bits of
courses and then join blocks in so that all of the tenors together lead
heads are rung but, as Eric Morecambe would say, not necessarily in the
right order.</span></p><span class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:rgb(31,73,125)">So although Pitman has 20 courses in each part, they are not all seven leads long.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:rgb(31,73,125)">In his 13440 he has some short courses and the missing leads are in the one with 2 or 3 at W.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span></p><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:rgb(31,73,125)">I haven’t written this out to prove my thinking but I must be close if not spot on."</span><br><br></span>But there must also be something about those new leads that are introduced in order that it stays true against the base course (RWTETWR).<br></div>You're effectively replacing the TWR with B plus a separate bW.<br></div>I'm guessing that the rows in those 3 new leads are either ones that would have appeared in the missing 3 leads from base course or else they have 1,7&8 in a combination that doesn't occur in the base course. <br><br></div>Cheers,<br></div>Alan<br><div><div><div><div><span class=""><br>13440 Spliced Surprise Major (6 methods)<br></span>
A J Pitman RW 1961 p287<span class=""><br>
<span class="m_-3966988652653696683gmail-im"><br>
23456 M W H Methods<br>
</span>------------------------------<wbr>-----<br></span>
52436 - RWTETW/R<span class=""><br>
64235 - - R/WTETWR/<br>
24536 - R/WTETWR<br>
65432 - - R/WTEB/<br>
46532 - RWTEB/<br>
53462 - - RWTETW/R/<br>
45362 - RWTEB/<br>
34562 3 - RWTETW/bW/bW/R/<br>
54632 2 - RWTETW/bW/R/<br>
26435 - - R/WTEB/<br>
32465 - RWTETW/R<br>
42635 2 - RWTETW/bW/R/<br>
56234 - - R/WTEB/<br>
25634 - RWTEB/<br>
63254 - - RWTETW/R/<br>
26354 - RWTEB/<br>
32654 3 - RWTETW/bW/bW/R/<br>
62534 2 - RWTETW/bW/R/<br>
35426 - - R/WTETW/R<br>
42356 - - RWTETW/R/<br></span>
------------------------------<wbr>-----<br>
3 part.<br><span class="">
<br>
3840 Watford, 3168 Rutland, Wembley(T),<br>
1920 Ealing, 672 Belvedere, Belgrave(b).<br><br><br><br><br><div><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:rgb(31,73,125)"></span></div></span></div></div></div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div class="h5">On 9 August 2017 at 14:40, Roddy Horton <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:roddy@horton.karoo.co.uk" target="_blank">roddy@horton.karoo.co.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br></div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div class="h5"><div link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="EN-GB"><div class="m_-3966988652653696683m_1001704783726834293WordSection1"><div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d">Don - </span><span style="font-family:"Courier New"">I must be being slow and missing something. I understand how this would work if every course were called the same, but that's not quite what's going on in these compositions, is it? What am I missing?<span style="color:#1f497d"><u></u><u></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">I think Pitman worked out that you cannot join 60 courses together with bobs only in full courses but of course in spliced you can ring bits of courses and then join blocks in so that all of the tenors together lead heads are rung but, as Eric Morecambe would say, not necessarily in the right order.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">So although Pitman has 20 courses in each part, they are not all seven leads long.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">In his 13440 he has some short courses and the missing leads are in the one with 2 or 3 at W.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">I haven’t written this out to prove my thinking but I must be close if not spot on.<span class="m_-3966988652653696683HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><u></u><u></u></font></span></span></p><span class="m_-3966988652653696683HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Roddy<u></u><u></u></span></p></font></span></div></div></div></div></div><br></div></div><span class="">______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
ringing-theory mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ringing-theory@bellringers.org" target="_blank">ringing-theory@bellringers.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/listinfo/ringing-theory" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.ringingworld.co.u<wbr>k/listinfo/ringing-theory</a><br>
<br></span></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>