[Bell Historians] 19th century bells

[George Dawson]

The Swan Tower??
GAD
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Bryant" <djb122 at y...>
To: <bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] 19th century bells


> oakcroft13 wrote:
>
> > I still maintain that, given a tower that doesn't sway, good internal
> > and external acoustics, and fittings in tip-top condition, you get a
> > smashing ring whatever the tuning, within reason. I recently rang on
> > a moderately heavy peal of eight, true-harmonic tuned to the n'th
> > degree, which did not possess these attributes, and to me they were a
> > great disappointment.
>
> I could add that I think many people (especially ringers!) greatly
> underestimate the importance of tower accoustics. A moderate ring can
> sound good in an accoustically generous tower, but in an accoustically
> poor tower they will sound poor. Even good bells will not sound as good
> as they could if they are in an accoustically poor tower. For instance,
> the bells at Towcester sound really super, but apparently at Todmorden
> they sounded quite good but cold because the bellchamber was mostly
> louvres so they couldn't resonate. In being moved, they sound better,
> and the reverse is true where a highly rated ring can be moved after
> great trouble has been taken to save them and people ringing on them in
> their new home wonder what all the fuss was about. Yes, there is a very
> good example of this.....
>
> David
>
>
> This message was sent to you via the Bell Historians' Mailing List. To
unsubscribe from the list send an email to
bellhistorians-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>