[Bell Historians] Dove inexactitudes

LOVE, Dickon DrLove at s...
Wed Oct 2 10:08:04 BST 2002

Re Ring of 13 versus 12+1, John Baldwin says that the "Ring of 13" is common
parlance. I would be interested to know by whom?

However, before people dive in with more feedback (John - I hope you see
this as feedback rather than criticism), perhaps John would confirm whether
this is a question up for review or not.


(Since other examples are coming in: Canterbury Cathedral ordered a ring of
12 in 1980 with 2 semitones, and that is what they are considered to be ...
never in my knowledge has 13 been rung - despite my best efforts :) )

This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the 
individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions presented are 
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of 
If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received
this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, 
or copying of this email is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this email in error please notify the
SchlumbergerSema Helpdesk by telephone on +44 (0) 121 627 5600.

More information about the Bell-historians mailing list