[Bell Historians] The Death Knell for British Founding
david at b...
Sat Apr 3 22:27:19 BST 2004
> The dates seem rather random and more mathematical than historical (where
> did they get 1850 from?)!
The major changes in the bell trade began with Grimthorpe in the mid-C19 -
that's where 1850 comes from.
> I don't suppose it will be long before someone objects to the removal of a
cast in crown staple on grounds of historical
Haven't EH already done so?
> Am I right in thinking that when the first list was drawn up bell metal
> relatively valuable compared to labour
I believe so.
> These days I would expect that the cost of recasting a bell is
> fairly prohibitive compared to that of retaining a bell for re-use. When
> historic bell is found to be unsuitable for use in a ringing peal is its
> retention as a service/clock bell economically viable?
I should imagine so - scrap value isn't much more than 100 quid a
hundredweight. That's another reason why listing bells isn't going to have
as great an impact as the RW is trying to suggest - the cost of retaining it
and having a new one won't be that much greater than recasting it, unless
it's a particularly large bell.
More information about the Bell-historians