[Bell Historians] RE Thin bells

David Bryant david at b...
Wed Dec 15 14:06:37 GMT 2004

> I see that I wrote, in 'From the E-lists' of 17 October 2003:
> "David Hird, on the nabbers list, opined that ‘in general bells
> underweight for their note are dustbins’. Not Lavenham, though (21cwt
> in Dflat), retorted Michael Royalton-Kisch."

Rather a sweeping generalisation, and not one which I would agree with. Some are, but equally some are not.



Whatever you Wanadoo:

This email has been checked for most known viruses - find out more at: http://www.wanadoo.co.uk/help/id/7098.htm

More information about the Bell-historians mailing list