[Bell Historians] Canon retaining bells
Richard Offen
richard.offen at o...
Thu Jul 15 08:46:40 BST 2004
> There is clearly a fascinating mystery lurking here. It was my
suggestion
> that the 1995 bells were cast with canons and fitted with canon-
retainers of
> the same pattern as the existing 6, so I was particularly
interested in this
> aspect of the project. I remember being surprised when told by the
project
> organiser that Whitechapel would not cast the bells with canons,
> particularly as it was hardly a new process. It was a little time
later that
> I was told that Whitechapel had now offered to cast on canons, but
these
> could only be Doncasters. This is how the Doncaster heads came
about - as I
> know it; and indeed how it was related in the RW article (written
not by me,
> but by one of the people very intimately involved at this stage)
>
> I shall seek confirmation - or otherwise - from the project
organiser(s) of
> the time.
>
> Chris Povey
Thanks Chris.
It was not my intention to doubt your word or your sanity! Like you
I am intrigued and, knowing what I know of Whitechapel's work in
recent times, just couldn't believe that they'd refused to cast a
bell with canons! Perhaps they did, but for the sake of an accurate
history of the project, we ought to find out once and for all.
Richard
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list