Fw: Re: Oldest Change Ringing bell
David Bryant
david at b...
Tue Mar 16 14:05:02 GMT 2004
> Message date : Mar 16 2004, 12:42 PM
> From : "Richard Offen"
> To : "djb122uk"
> Copy to :
> Subject : Re: Oldest Change Ringing bell
> --- In bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com, "djb122uk" wrote:
> > DLC
> >
> > > So, what advances on Canterbury, St Dunstan, 5th of six, c1325,
> > William le Belyetere of Canterbury ?
> > >
> > > Come on, boys and girls, someone can do better than that can't
> > they ?
> >
> > Surely it isn't possible to get a definitive answer to this, as the
> > dating of virtually all bells of this date is only approximate. We
> > have one in York of c.1350 (2nd at the former St John), and a dated
> > exanple (tenor) in the same ring of 1408. Is this the earliest
> dated
> > bell still in a ring?
> >
> > David
>
> You can usually get a pretty good idea of date of a bell from the
> profile. Both DLC and I have rung on one which, quite clearly from
> its shape, is at least 40 or 50 years older than St Dunstan's fifth,
> but that one is now hung for chiming so doesn't count!
>
> R
>
>
Freeserve AnyTime - HALF PRICE for the first 3 months - Save £7.50 a month
www.freeserve.com/anytime
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list