[Bell Historians] Writtle
mike at m...
Tue Feb 1 18:17:23 GMT 2005
--- In bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com, Benjamin Kipling <bdk at b...>
> >(David Bryant)
> >.... I wonder why they chose this option for a light eight, rather
than having a flat 4th >and extra treble. etc.
Is not the main difference really that the 2# gives a ring of eight
that is one bell lighter than the alternative? If the main reason is
to get a "light" ring of 8 then this is the sensible scheme.
However, if you might ever want a light 10 ................
More information about the Bell-historians