In defence of RHS!

Richard Offen richard at y52jsqlScC3PU1ISIvUsjRK2aYyqJdTNafZ5-W34OO3EjH7HmYS81DlXSq3Cup_jTI9KyJE-7Kp2.yahoo.invalid
Thu Feb 9 13:36:23 GMT 2006

Previous message (by thread): In defence of RHS!
Next message (by thread): [Bell Historians] In defence of RHS!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> The slating of RHS on this list is undeserved, I have seen no 
compelling  
> evidence (as yet) to convince me otherwise.
>  
Hear, hear!

R

Previous message (by thread): In defence of RHS!
Next message (by thread): [Bell Historians] In defence of RHS!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Bell-historians mailing list