[Bell Historians] Trafalgar Square

David Cawley dave at 3GvLZIFYj8EslxF_wXlMf4lMpJBujzgUuCu7x_sxtQFCXQp-aCnD7FQPSEDZhjKT5VlxVyraOQr1TWpfFX9zaXq9K9Y.yahoo.invalid
Sat May 27 20:35:52 BST 2006


What a curious reply. How long have I known Nigel Taylor and he can't spell 
my surname!

Second, I was not present at the try-out of St Dunstan-in-the-East in 1953 
(when I would have been 8 or 9 years old). It was taken in 1966 when we rang 
all eight bells for the first time since 1953.

Perhaps NST knows something about the circumstances in London following the 
installation of his namesakes' bells that I don't..?

David Cawley
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "nigelsdtaylor" <nigeltaylor at Cw2plfOHKanVCzjEurS81PWuVbgUP56_JA9Pdhg25t1lT70-EYCJPs-Zn6AoGQNlnDP22UJxXNHUZJbV2DIcC6XHeMyHJkkjgfnMiQ.yahoo.invalid>
To: <bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 8:05 PM
Subject: [Bell Historians] Trafalgar Square


> David Crawley wrote:It's only one step away from the old Bullring
> bells to St
> Martin-in-the-Fields. Disposed of as beyond tuning and replaced by a
> very
> ordinary ring (who would believe that the grand neighbouring rings at
> the
> Abbey and St Clement Danes are from the same pot?). And like the old
> Bullring bells they were most successfully tuned and have gone to a
> home
> where they are appreciated - and again with a different acoustic!
>
> DLC
> I do not agree:my impression of Westminster abbey bells is that they
> are sweet, but bland. Trafalgar Square have a lot more "bass".
> On another subject, I like the picture of the Rev. David, taken at the
> try out at St. Dunstan-in-the-east in 1953.
> Nigel Taylor
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 



           



More information about the Bell-historians mailing list