[Bell Historians] Re: Rudhall Rings

[Andrew Higson]

Quite so, how did you work tuning into that though?
 
-----Original Message-----
From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
[mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
matthewhigby at sxHJLlwh-CAan4YHS-bWUfC3nalsNZwkNmxQveUQafkywL0mY1bWILkbg1NSwT4zCGq4q3cuFWPgk2_I.yahoo.invalid
Sent: 15 November 2006 10:55
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Re: Rudhall Rings




In a message dated 15/11/2006 09:58:21 GMT Standard Time,
andrew_higson at tOwuRyxk7-yXD84ZhTfwR1ZjQOwtXI36DZmcVardHexCDslC9wui2_UpadCMlBTdXHZtNDmc0PoDib0DpSgXPSfs_qn82tY.yahoo.invalid writes:


Almost right, David. Our rehang was in 1901, though. The more recent
work of replacing the trebles and adding the flat sixth were done by
WBF.
 
ADH

>From 12 bell website: "Taylor's returned in 1979 to fit ball bearings to
all twelve bells"
 
Matthew Higby & Co Ltd,
Church Bell Engineers.
Jasmine Cottage,
The Street,
Chilcompton,
Bath,
BA3 4HN.

 
           
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20061115/6234512d/attachment.html>