[Bell Historians] One N or two?
David Bryant
davidbryant at K7P3-91UElx08lEe5aqvythcW8tGV-bOI6u4bWTju9IxiqzI5CcIkB2tfNiolwi39zNV76VUQiNX3WBIB_c6XKn1.yahoo.invalid
Thu Sep 14 20:24:52 BST 2006
> Actually when your message arrived (message #10903) the following were
Messages arrive in my inbox in a rather random order - something to do with
hotmail addresses.
> non members but thoroughgly reliable on this matter include
> Rev Ellacomb (dec)
> the editors of the OED (dec)
> the author of The Tintinnalogia (dec)
Reliable in what sense? 'cannons' seems to have been the most usual spelling
amongst published Victorian and early C20 bell historians. However, since
Fred Sharpe virtually all published work has used the spelling 'canons'. The
only obvious exception to this is Paul Cattermole.
David
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list