[Bell Historians] Tuning figures

[Andrew Higson]

Quite by coincidence also by Warners 1915 I've just done a tonal on:
 
7th - 191/451/472/ /781 - hum 38 cents flat, fundamental 249 cents sharp
8th - 172/387/425/ /698 - hum 25 cents flat, fundamental 179 cents sharp
 
Not easy listening.
 
Andrew 
-----Original Message-----
From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
[mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
matthewhigby at 7hvsBxHH-OuymuX4LR7wu7aZiJHwrXxviFvJusWZUT5_FVLqUt8qUVyK57hQLeM6xCiTIFDqXe1pA74.yahoo.invalid
Sent: 18 January 2007 14:01
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Tuning figures




Not quite as bad as Aldbourne 5th........
 
M 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: richard.offen at tKt5O4ziu3SUU4oS5MxGvqZke_XFsPvenRfzlEPy9nUzUygBeOZNDqlVadfhowaiNGFO060Zac6_hJ86OK7LagVs3yE.yahoo.invalid
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12.49PM
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Tuning figures



> Anybody else taken the pitches at Aldbourne? I find I am in trouble 
with
> figures for the Warner 1915 5th which, in fairness, does have some 
very
> strange partial tones indeed.
> 
> C D
>

Most Warner bells of that period do (Chelmsford Cathedral spring to 
mind!), but they tune usually up quite well.

R



 
           
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20070118/130d29cc/attachment.html>