[Bell Historians] pNBR data

Andrew Bull a_m_bull at bfYms-GL1poPl1XsZB8dUK9TTivZAkC1LmWP2TLg3WTJpID06PAeA8rwERhvfuEGF_te8yrW2Lp7R3IM.yahoo.invalid
Sat Jul 21 22:28:10 BST 2007


I believe that this is the ring listed on ADH’s spreadsheet as “Newchurch
Keynon”. All 1923, tenor 12-0-14 in G. A look on the map deepens this
suspicion, Newchurch, Keynon and Culcheth all being very close together. I
don’t have further details in any of my files, but presumably one of our
Loughborough friends can supply the rest.

 

Andrew Bull

 

  _____  

From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com [mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Richard Offen
Sent: 21 July 2007 17:06
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] pNBR data

 

--- In bellhistorians@ <mailto:bellhistorians%40yahoogroups.com>
yahoogroups.com, "Sam Austin" <sam0austin at ...> 
wrote:
>
> Culcheth are Taylor's 1923 but something tells me they were a six put 
up to
> 8. All true harmonic anyway.

They're not on Andrew Higson's list of complete Taylor rings.

R

 

           
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20070721/1130a40d/attachment.html>


More information about the Bell-historians mailing list