[Bell Historians] Half-pull Ringing
aaspland at HhXZeG2ruLYuUajhmVhrfkFJbAvAJDwrVzt4FIg_Ti-nSeO7DXohvTrk1uPREoeVJ8gmOwMTDNKtZzoZvAM.yahoo.invalid
Sat Nov 17 18:34:55 GMT 2007
Because the series of books finishes with the eighteenth century and I am
asking about the early twentieth century AND surely the whole point of
studying history is that there is not always one definitive answer.
From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
[mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Richard Offen
Sent: 16 November 2007 12:41
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Half-pull Ringing
Why do we need to theorise when the history of the development of
change ringing is so very well told by John Eisel and the late Bill
Cook in Volume 1 of "Change Ringing History: The History of an English
Art" (CCBR Publication)?
> An interesting thread.
> I wonder if changing at one stroke only had application where full
> wheels were not present.
> getting a bell 3/4 up and controlling it on a leaver results in a hand
> stroke but no back stroke.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Bell-historians