GAD
Andrew Higson
andrew.higson at -EhVTZz3y7sr3DpdOzWPkbncspl1H5RBa56K5aOliYiyTOsaX0ur5q8hDEV0-bSKgf4CxrVWqC6OlxWFWq0tpb3OBtsrHg.yahoo.invalid
Thu Aug 7 16:35:43 BST 2008
You're a bit faint - are you a long vay avay?
Andrew Higson
Taylors Eayre and Smith Ltd
The Bellfoundry
Freehold Street
Loughborough
LE11 1AR
Telephone: 01509 212241 Fax: 01509 263305 Registered in England No.
1352309
________________________________
From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
[mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of George Dawson
Sent: 07 August 2008 16:31
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Bell Historians] Re: Diameters (was Dogmersfield)
testing
========================================
Message Received: Aug 07 2008, 02:45 PM
From: "Chris Pickford"
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Cc:
Subject: [Bell Historians] Re: Diameters (was Dogmersfield)
We've been here before, I think, but no two people -
bellfounders or what the Victorians used to term "Bell hunters" - will
measure diameters exactly the same. Even people who are careful and
measuring in idea circumstances may vary by up to 1/8" and sometimes
more.
While some bells are elliptical, that's not really a major
reason for variations in quoted diameters. It's much more about human
error, access, degree of care and (let's not forget it) the accuracy of
measuring equipment - minor damage to the end of a steel tape can easily
lead to an error of 1/16" or more.
Anyway, all I'm really saying is that while accurate measurement
is clearly desirable, there's a practical limit - and it's not worth
getting het up about differences of 1/8" or 1/16"
CP
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20080807/2ab3815d/attachment.html>
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list