[Bell Historians] Re: CD of Worcester Cathedral Bells
matthewhigby at rANHCs0HEYApzuA9mnp2Hv5_ROepPZxHjGmG5BwcJf3JSO3BjKbvcKXiMH3cN8aJzNf_WuPi8ILs4g.yahoo.invalid
matthewhigby at rANHCs0HEYApzuA9mnp2Hv5_ROepPZxHjGmG5BwcJf3JSO3BjKbvcKXiMH3cN8aJzNf_WuPi8ILs4g.yahoo.invalid
Thu Dec 18 10:42:20 GMT 2008
In a message dated 18/12/2008 09:08:09 GMT Standard Time,
davidbryant at pQJSJbgaFSmyiGuijb-bSctKLVhqq_fqeL8seNZ-4f00-HULoOTWLzu6VX90xQc5KvNJhoWt-NFUx0o-gB4JJxP4vK0.yahoo.invalid writes:
Surley a major factor must be the acoustics of the towers having new rings
installed. It's become relatively rare for bellfounders to get the opportinity
for a complete new ring, and even when that does happen how often do towers
with the acoustics of, say, Chewton Mendip come up? Virtually never, I would
say.
Agreed!
Look how many new "complete" peals were cast between 1970 and 2008 (about
100 by Taylors), in comparison to 1900 to 1939 (about 340 by Taylors). There
was about 3 times more chance of finding a good tower back then!
Is the drastic reduction down to Heritage Issues, the decline of the CofE or
is there just less money about???
Matthew
Matthew Higby & Company Ltd,
Church Bell Engineers,
Jasmine Cottage,
The Street,
Chilcompton,
Bath,
BA3 4HN.
www.bell-hangers.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20081218/5d78e0d6/attachment.html>
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list