[Bell Historians] New poll for bellhistorians

[Andrew Wilby]

Not much point in having a poll without setting out the issues and if 
necessary debating them first?
Andrew


David Bryant wrote:
>
> I would be interested to see what the general view on the matter is – 
> the poll is anonymous so there isn’t any list of who has voted which way!
>
>  
>
> David
>
>  
>
> * From: * bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com 
> [mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com]
> *Sent:* 07 January 2008 22:13
> *To:* bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
> *Subject:* [Bell Historians] New poll for bellhistorians
>
>  
>
>
> Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
> bellhistorians group:
>
> Should the proposals for a new ring of bells at St Michael, Cornhill, 
> London , be allowed to go ahead?
>
> o Yes
> o No
>
> To vote, please visit the following web page:
> http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/bellhistor ians/surveys? id=12700192 
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bellhistorians/surveys?id=12700192>
>
> Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
> not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
> web site listed above.
>
> Thanks!
>
> 
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1212 - Release Date: 
> 06/01/2008 22:55
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1212 - Release Date: 
> 06/01/2008 22:55
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.11/1200 - Release Date: 27/12/2007 13:34
>