[Bell Historians] 3 bell restorations
davidhird_uk
davidhird_uk at WU3KtySSEo38QRa99ct_Ky4_nLfCsCYoWEbxc6PiHSKkoXmH-87SoNBu7iX9ht7IAzDdbl03LNeM9PzDoa-LLTSf.yahoo.invalid
Sun Jan 20 12:26:27 GMT 2008
A lot depends on what sort of adviser is involved and which firm
quotes for rehanging. We lost Middleton in Teesdale due to the bell
hanging firm falling over themselves to agree with the
preservationists and the result is a levered mess. Similarly
Bishopton.
David
--- In bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com, "Colin Turner" <colin at ...>
wrote:
>
> Ah! I had forgotten about the Southwell Diocese, probably because
many of
> the lesser numbered rings are augmented when restored. I know a
few people
> are against augmentation, but at the end of the day, there is more
chance of
> bells being rung regularly - and of retaining a band - if there
are 5 or 6
> bells rather than three. There are quite a few very ringable 3
bell towers
> in the Oxford Diocese, but to my knowledge only one, Didcot, has a
regular
> band of ringers. That said, I think it is more likely that the
bells are
> heard more frequently at those towers where the bells are hung for
ringing,
> than those where lever chiming is the mode. There will be an
occasional
> visiting band and ringing can be provided by other towers for
weddings &
> special services.
>
> As a matter of interest, perhaps George can provide us with some
data on the
> number of rings of 5 and above in the Southwell Diocese in say
1970,
> compared with today. I doubt if many (if any) other Dioceses will
have seen
> such an increase.
>
>
> Colin
>
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list