Moseley St Mary

George Dawson george at 2LVgl9D6pitP3hR0oTDq84cjsd0pGHxv5faaAuFSmPAgq7TG_M09seXiDCunnjdlDxfo3Gjjagk_xdEtza9KPOWtzuI.yahoo.invalid
Mon May 19 16:00:32 BST 2008


If the gudgeons were safe enough with plain bearings, then why should they
not be with ball bearings?

 Clearly here there was a more substantial failure than b/b collapse.

George

 

From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com [mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Richard Offen
Sent: 19 May 2008 14:44
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Bell Historians] Moseley St Mary

 

Ball bearings, no doubt fitted to the old gudgeons, which will have been of
too small a diameter for safe use with ball bearings.

 

R

 

  _____  

From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com [mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of David Cawley
Sent: Monday, 19 May 2008 7:30 PM
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Cc: Simon Adams
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Moseley St Mary

 

Background: The eight steel bells were rehung with part new fittings, and
with extraordinary devotion, by volunteer labour 18 years ago.

 

Bearings: They were a light shafting type, the sort Richard will be familiar
with as fitted to the bells at St Alphege, Whitstable, but larger of course.

 

What happened: A gudgeon or a bearing housing broke, with like effect on its
opposite number and the bell fell into its pit.

 

Guidance from above, perhaps. But they have a strong band and competent
leadership with plans for the future.

 

DLC  

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Richard <mailto:richard.offen at WHnzGD83ddQ99GOafmyiKHuFb-XoPNGDamHSbRk430eee0qj-exbANoo-nczN0q4e-KvrnV7JUDJXBe3EW0FXPA.yahoo.invalid>  Offen 

To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com 

Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 11:04 AM

Subject: RE: [Bell Historians] Moseley St Mary

 

Please could we have a little more background to this mishap?   

It's a job to see what type of bearings they were.   What happened to cause
the accident?

Richard

  _____  

From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com [mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Mike Chester
Sent: Monday, 19 May 2008 3:39 PM
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Bell Historians] Moseley St Mary

I think that this falls into the "Oops" category!

http://www.warksbells.co.uk/images/moseley_st_mary2.jpg

The bell is undamaged, the wheel and gudgeons destroyed. Whether or 
not you think that this is the wrong way round it entirely up to you!

Mike

 

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1448 - Release Date: 16/05/2008
7:42 PM

 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.21/1454 - Release Date: 19/05/2008
7:44 AM

  _____  

size=2 width="100%" align=center> 

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1429 - Release Date: 12/05/2008
18:14

 

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.21/1454 - Release Date: 19/05/2008
7:44 AM

 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.21/1454 - Release Date: 19/05/2008
7:44 AM

 

           
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20080519/2a4286bd/attachment.html>


More information about the Bell-historians mailing list