[Bell Historians] Minsters

David Willis dcwillispiano at vDWcuAAQM27ik8YZ1tCNRiAJXdgbO4IPzGk1g3SbGTc-hDNioHag9jBF2oKaDyujRL7lykeWo4ipaTXdZV24v1w.yahoo.invalid
Fri Oct 10 17:57:41 BST 2008


I think you will find that St Mary in the butts as its sometimes referred to
has had the title of Minster for ages , its just that no one has chosen to use
it . 
 
So far as i can remember , Fred Sharpe Church Bells of Berkshire uses
the Minster title .
 
David
 


--- On Fri, 10/10/08, Richard Offen <richard.offen at n0L8aLVrLGFQPbCn4KKJafhMtqC0diBd_g_RLLLj8SYHG1EWi0F5BUXYUGUh62ulVB2T381UjQchigmhC-GsOA.yahoo.invalid> wrote:

From: Richard Offen <richard.offen at n0L8aLVrLGFQPbCn4KKJafhMtqC0diBd_g_RLLLj8SYHG1EWi0F5BUXYUGUh62ulVB2T381UjQchigmhC-GsOA.yahoo.invalid>
Subject: [Bell Historians] Minsters
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, October 10, 2008, 4:29 PM








I know we have discussed the definition of a ‘minster’ in the past, but why has there been a sudden proliferation of churches being designated as “the minster church of …”?   I notice on Campanophile that St Mary’s, Reading has become another church with delusions of grandeur!
 
Richard 














                 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20081010/2f6b6f7b/attachment.html>


More information about the Bell-historians mailing list