[Bell Historians] Faculty Petition - advice please

John H Allen john at w8CN_rsUr26_8tzd-k7y4dWxX8YCJN-wy5fpkoGjtOvaVCa0I9WbY80-ELRx0Z4NnRCMeSkAly22xcsOCNQ.yahoo.invalid
Tue Aug 18 19:14:54 BST 2009


David,

 

I agree with Peter Rivet. The Registrar needs to be asked in writing to be
very specific why he has made this direction and asked to quote the relevant
parts of the FJR 2000 in his reply.

 

I wonder whether this is a case of the Registrar being unsure of his ground
and making himself fireproof? Could the Archdeacon ask the Registrar why he
has made this Direction?

 

John

 

 

  _____  

From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com [mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of David Beacham
Sent: Tuesday 18 August 2009 16:59
To: ringing-chat at 1cE5nAVYyzZlhC-kb9SE94pjVJ8tgKlsYLEDFwzam4LaTfRPS7puEuzwrNfiy8HAYlY7XvUAHv5RSKEI4R_FhOVvjbAO0Xw.yahoo.invalid; change-ringers at XgdynVsV8H1g3dusr3Yu_UblFIXoUtetKCfosi5SKafEMJE882_yTMksQSMFB-yqhzyHo_7sJOTn__h1boQXfSXwknlKXX6YOw.yahoo.invalid;
bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Bell Historians] Faculty Petition - advice please

 

  

As a recently retired DAC bell advisor I thought I knew all about the
faculty application process. However, a petition to install a flat 6th in
my own church (Worcester, All Saints) has got hung up on a late direction by

the Diocesan Registrar. The petition had completed all the usual processes, 
i.e. consultation with the DAC, English Heritage and the Georgian Group (it 
being an C18 church) and no objections raised. Now, the Registrar is saying 
that it also needs to be referred to the Local Authority and a Public Notice

inserted in the local press. He cites the Faculty Jurisdiction Rules 2000, 
Sections 13 (3) and (4) and Appendix B as requiring this action.

I have never before heard of a faculty application to augment a ring being
subject to approval by the Local Authority. Furthermore, since part of the
application process requires the churchwardens to display a Citation (i.e.a
Public Notice) on the church's notice board for a period of 28 days, and
which they did weeks ago, why on earth should further notice be required by 
way of a notice in the local paper?

The Faculty Jurisdiction Rules 2000 may be found at
http://www.opsi. <http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2000/20002047.htm#13>
gov.uk/si/si2000/20002047.htm#13

Can anyone out there with the required specialist (legal) knowledge say
whether or not the Diocesan Registrar is interpreting the rules correctly?
Has any other church had to involve the Local Authority in this way in
recent times?

DB



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.60/2311 - Release Date: 08/18/09
06:03:00


           
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20090818/1ae0e921/attachment.html>


More information about the Bell-historians mailing list