[Bell Historians] Fw: Bell

matthewhigby at _0hn6fHpkmvSODt2OCt55WCS--pNl_RUkfRICNL2vKQpYZM_DgNxmQsWHrq2BDO3l3RbnumnzA-e-seKMHs.yahoo.invalid matthewhigby at _0hn6fHpkmvSODt2OCt55WCS--pNl_RUkfRICNL2vKQpYZM_DgNxmQsWHrq2BDO3l3RbnumnzA-e-seKMHs.yahoo.invalid
Sat Dec 19 09:42:50 GMT 2009


Certainly is!

Matthew


Is this not a James Barwell bell 1870 - 1920




-----Original Message-----
From: khsbelring at yuXHolteABMEMs4gtI3Z5gkNOQmUQ053MtLaR8Y7MrWZKJdHgWRwm5HDt_hZzX6VJCpUY20JAZbPBY8.yahoo.invalid
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat, Dec 19, 2009 9:39 am
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Fw: Bell


 


Is this not a James Barwell bell 1870 - 1920

Is this not a James Barwell bell 1870 - 1920




           
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20091219/051e4132/attachment.html>


More information about the Bell-historians mailing list