[Bell Historians] Latchet stays, was St Barnabas, Pimlico
Alan Taylor
alantaylor at Gpdr8oOq_KcvP7flMm5pq4IJlo2UqgSRHWUjw0wHSsTN-pN3pubI8cZYaWhsKvM5_fGqDJIGvBwIscKeKDG5FIxi.yahoo.invalid
Mon Dec 21 09:50:28 GMT 2009
Looking at the pictures of the latchet stay device at Pimlico it strikes
me that the system would quite readily accommodate a torque device to
prevent damage if a bell bumped the "stay" to danger point. That little
lug on the headstock could readily, I think be developed to incorporate
a device such as is used in torque spanners ,that would flip back if
struck too hard and allow the bell to go over. This leads me to wonder
whether automatic fail safe stay devices of any description have been
developed and used. Any ideas?
Ted
If this arrangement is supposed to be an unbreakable stay, were do we
consider
the next point of weakness is. Would a bell jump out of plain bearings or
might
it just break off at the cannons.
David
According to the DBA and the Foundry what you have suggested is correct.
Plus, the headstock breaking in half. One of the headstocks does show signs
of being hit hard and will have to have steel bands placed around it.
Alan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20091221/6e20b8e8/attachment.html>
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list