[Bell Historians] Re: Levels of Bell Production

[Richard Offen]

It would be very interesting to see how this compares to the same period
around the beginning of the 20th century.

 

R

 

  _____  

From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com [mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of John
Sent: Friday, 16 October 2009 11:08 PM
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Bell Historians] Re: Levels of Bell Production

 

  



--- In bellhistorians@ <mailto:bellhistorians%40yahoogroups.com>
yahoogroups.com, "Andrew Cairns" <andrew.cairns at ...> wrote:
>
> I was interested to read Mark Regan's letter (and associated graph) in
todays RW. This may have been discussed before but has anyone done a similar
analysis in other counties or nationally? It would also be interesting to
know who Mark compiled his numbers; the obvious starting point in the NBR

Here is the data from the pNBR for the years back to 1970:

pNBR bells
=============
Year in pNBR
-------------
1970: 101
1971: 120
1972: 82
1973: 110
1974: 84
1975: 76
1976: 60
1977: 125
1978: 120
1979: 107
1980: 101
1981: 102
1982: 78
1983: 85
1984: 81
1985: 71
1986: 56
1987: 110
1988: 100
1989: 97
1990: 81
1991: 108
1992: 105
1993: 84
1994: 68
1995: 124
1996: 116
1997: 89
1998: 223
1999: 145
2000: 167
2001: 115
2002: 72
2003: 113
2004: 110
2005: 112
2006: 109
2007: 85
2008: 100
2009: 54
=============
Total: 4046



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.422 / Virus Database: 270.14.20/2441 - Release Date: 10/16/09
18:39:00


           
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20091017/5cbdd72f/attachment.html>