[Bell Historians] Hanley
    David Willis 
    dcwillispiano at GS7g4ZjXLY_KzWZ3PWga2UJBWVyJq2H7s8a1qEXo0XkEqBhE4PSOCfk_mzIL8GylWjdR4QPe9PK_1Lb-sRQx.yahoo.invalid
       
    Fri Jul 30 12:23:32 BST 2010
    
    
  
--- On Fri, 30/7/10, Chris Darvill <manager at EEL00Q0sXnzglIO4ilOCfsrZaj5zHcOQ5uJy9KnOFLuq74jdIWf5Hf23NV5V-NqZZ9Nn7gasJcnz0HtqmWfDsys.yahoo.invalid> wrote:
      At 11:59 30/07/2010, David Willis wrote:
>Can you show me how I can read what EH has to say about it please.
>I would like to know which side they are supporting .#
http://www.planning.stoke.gov.uk/Documents/6696_16.pdf
Chris 
That's a relief .  Interesting how EH don't say that they are in favour,
only that they don't object. Is there anything to be read into that ?
David
    
     
    
    
 
  
                 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20100730/1847b246/attachment.html>
    
    
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list