[Bell Historians] Re: Definition of Touch

Alan Buswell aaj.buswell at jTIUNdFdvoOAxGC8GKxKlbyUCSn7--6aF8hzuei2-9u592Weeh4szmpKuLRpBmAAuPmhRZzeeDS9Raz2JOrTNw.yahoo.invalid
Thu Mar 18 09:19:39 GMT 2010

A date touch is a date touch, likewise a 2500 is a touch. What therefore is a long lenght?
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bickerton, Roderic (SELEX GALILEO, UK) 
  To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 10:16 AM
  Subject: RE: [Bell Historians] Re: Definition of Touch


  Why surely a 1/4 is just a particular of a touch.
  Consider date touches are longer than 1/4's.

SELEX Galileo LtdRegistered Office: Sigma House, Christopher Martin Road, Basildon, Essex SS14 3ELA company registered in England & Wales.  Company no. 02426132********************************************************************This email and any attachments are confidential to the intendedrecipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intendedrecipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose ordistribute its contents to any other person.********************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20100318/ef4106ff/attachment.html>

More information about the Bell-historians mailing list