[Bell Historians] Have you voted yet?

[Sam Austin]

Not so, some comments were wrongly attributed to me and this is what they
said in reply:



Thanks for pointing this out to us.  We are receiving literally hundreds of
comments on this application so its possible our computer system has
'gliched' somewhere.  Your original comments will be associated correctly
with your details when published, its just the acknowledgement letter that
seems to have faulted.  We will look into it.


Aye


Sam




>
> I received four email acknowledgements for my one submission! Only 188 ‘in
> favour’ responses from the ringing community does seem a little
> disappointing so just hope my submission will be counted 4x by Stoke
> Council, although if as AWRW says ‘votes are not weighed’ then I guess that
> can be no advantage. I circulated the original message/links in Bedfordshire
> in the hope of getting a little more support, but it appears that only a few
> have actually responded – I will give it another try.
>
>
>
> S
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com [mailto:
> bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf Of *John Harrison
> *Sent:* 05 May 2010 09:44
>
> *To:* bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [Bell Historians] Have you voted yet?
>
>
>
>
>
> Richard
>
>
> > They don't make it easy to check your submission is logged. I cannot
> > find mine.
>
> There is a list with addresses but not names.
>
> It's interesting to see us all categorised as 'neighbours' with addresses
> far and wide. Interestingly, I noticed one address twice - maybe two
> people in the same house.
>
> Regards
>
> --
> John Harrison
> Website http://jaharrison.me.uk
>
> Message sent from an Iyonix running RISC-OS 5
>   
>
           
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20100505/a8751d0b/attachment.html>