[Bell Historians] Riverside Carillon.

Roderic Bickerton rodbic at Ewf-nrVhPwgbXc-HT1juAWh44Hqj7FA8IYgDLM0hLyvlC-t-FOMNgPhGcEGRl3dbLUZVA_rCvdv2KQ.yahoo.invalid
Sat Oct 30 20:41:31 BST 2010


That would only give a soundbow thickness of  9/16", the small carillon bells I have seen are very thick, well over 1" thick
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Dwhgodwin at F_YKXmzjcBxHBz2kkNcEO5UETmgj0GwfcZdp0FArp_FZimJ4O-ybO4DTCW1RBBOFFF84-mFSRmsqDBk.yahoo.invalid 
  To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 4:13 PM
  Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Riverside Carillon.




  Would 5 7/8" be the strike diameter at the thickest part of the sound bow? would your informant be able to check this?
  DG









  -----Original Message-----
  From: Alan Buswell <aaj.buswell at kJyXtCofJfdpyjpCxURSp4ISDYM1gMOktUJNrrjU4qwdN07KZ_MXQxL0Us1whnexlP4257zRAhwaVznmwa4XlOWH.yahoo.invalid>
  To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 15:38
  Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Riverside Carillon.


    
  That's precisely what I'm wanting to know. G&J says diameter is 5 7/8 inches, actual outside measurement, as measured by my informant - 7 inches. The former measurement being the inside. 

  AAJB.
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Roderic Bickerton 
    To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com 
    Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 3:12 PM
    Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Riverside Carillon.


      
    Hoe very odd, Hoe on earth can you sensibly determine an inside diameter at the lip the shape being a curve?
    sounds an implaudable explanation.


    On 24 October 2010 15:46, alanaj8283 <aaj.buswell at kJyXtCofJfdpyjpCxURSp4ISDYM1gMOktUJNrrjU4qwdN07KZ_MXQxL0Us1whnexlP4257zRAhwaVznmwa4XlOWH.yahoo.invalid> wrote:

        
      My attention has been drawn to the fact that there may be two ways of measuring a bell's diameter. Bell No.7 of the G&J Riverside Carillon, weighing only 15lbs, has been measured as 7" (no typo error)on the outside (lip to lip)but in the G&J Tuning Books it is given as 5 7/8". The measurements have been checked by my informer and shows the smaller measurement to be that of the INSIDE of the bell. What of the other bells here, I wonder?

      Is this the usual practice of Cyril or may be anyone else?

      AAJB








             
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20101030/61ff1657/attachment.html>


More information about the Bell-historians mailing list