[Bell Historians] Riverside Carillon.
Alan Buswell
aaj.buswell at Etd2rJnq6bOPjG-zCM9dXniIXsUhxxcb5d2y0qDqkCbh83zgo-GrWRtXijUu4uhPt7jo5y9kquGpXlg7D8UacA.yahoo.invalid
Sun Oct 31 15:28:32 GMT 2010
7 minus 5 7/8 should = 1 1/8?
AAJB.
----- Original Message -----
From: Roderic Bickerton
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Riverside Carillon.
That would only give a soundbow thickness of 9/16", the small carillon bells I have seen are very thick, well over 1" thick
----- Original Message -----
From: Dwhgodwin at 69nYJznOpr2qv1QEKeKiyBwPhJBnt0sLSQo2LAT5WDxCZILTYWRdjlCquPlFgcytKel8NbtqySjLcok.yahoo.invalid
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 4:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Riverside Carillon.
Would 5 7/8" be the strike diameter at the thickest part of the sound bow? would your informant be able to check this?
DG
-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Buswell <aaj.buswell at XVOq83N8S240Z30FmWS4nbdeNReYZltZWImD5hHtYTUNlEkul9F-VJLMDUt8lPmuUN9T1FZ0-nyUwCv705WZJ9vtdsSA.yahoo.invalid>
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 15:38
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Riverside Carillon.
That's precisely what I'm wanting to know. G&J says diameter is 5 7/8 inches, actual outside measurement, as measured by my informant - 7 inches. The former measurement being the inside.
AAJB.
----- Original Message -----
From: Roderic Bickerton
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Riverside Carillon.
Hoe very odd, Hoe on earth can you sensibly determine an inside diameter at the lip the shape being a curve?
sounds an implaudable explanation.
On 24 October 2010 15:46, alanaj8283 <aaj.buswell at XVOq83N8S240Z30FmWS4nbdeNReYZltZWImD5hHtYTUNlEkul9F-VJLMDUt8lPmuUN9T1FZ0-nyUwCv705WZJ9vtdsSA.yahoo.invalid> wrote:
My attention has been drawn to the fact that there may be two ways of measuring a bell's diameter. Bell No.7 of the G&J Riverside Carillon, weighing only 15lbs, has been measured as 7" (no typo error)on the outside (lip to lip)but in the G&J Tuning Books it is given as 5 7/8". The measurements have been checked by my informer and shows the smaller measurement to be that of the INSIDE of the bell. What of the other bells here, I wonder?
Is this the usual practice of Cyril or may be anyone else?
AAJB
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20101031/67c8d285/attachment.html>
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list