[Bell Historians] Re: Netiquette
Peter Trent
peter.trent at BrNzBipKuQZRf-reivK6NXeMEjXtB2-qz9e114qQd96K93-uzeU--Mw4auA1GuXjac0Wl1GYZyZYkGtFX9bmDeIPwg.yahoo.invalid
Tue Sep 14 18:26:46 BST 2010
Perhaps there are others like me , (yes even in this day and age) who are not sufficiently netliterate to understand the meaning of the term "top posting" but unlike me are afraid to ask for an explanation... please!
----- Original Message -----
From: fartwell2000
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 6:01 PM
Subject: [Bell Historians] Re: Netiquette
--- In bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com, "Dickon Love" <dickon at ...> wrote:
>
> Please may I remind people that they shouldn't be top posting on this site.
>
Seems to have fallen of deaf ears-in the last block of mesages I read, responses were all over the place :-)
Perhaps a fine could be imposed for top posting and all the proceeds would be most welcome for the Barnoldswick augmentation fund!
Alan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20100914/a5ac13ab/attachment.html>
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list