[Bell Historians] Re: Chester Cathedral

Sam Austin sam0austin at 700NydqxnWPH2vvgjkY3hnqEkN_f_mfOcv2hsL8ykC6VvJ5XqInOn-S0pMgISVFi9rgL-K2Suc34MOya.yahoo.invalid
Thu Apr 21 08:47:17 BST 2011


It's been removed now.

Sam

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:27 AM, John H Allen <john at I-PmB13wDKEmgfThJlwnTe7agv2SmHWZ_g0wac-k0p8Bo15dLUAiOU6ANZHlZrM15le25S5sWvY1.yahoo.invalid> wrote:

>
>
>  From the Dove website help screen:-
>
>
>
> On the question of "absolute accuracy", readers should be aware of the fact
> that, although the details shown against any entry are the best we can
> obtain, some part (such as 'unringability') may actually be open to a degree
> of subjectivity
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com [mailto:
> bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Richard
> *Sent:* Thursday 21 April 2011 01:58
> *To:* bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
> *Subject:* [Bell Historians] Re: Chester Cathedral
>
>
>
>
>
> I suspect this is probably the first that Whitechapel knew about having
> cast such a large chime!!!
>
> This is probably either the work of a hacker or an April Fools Day joke.
>
> R
>
> --- In bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com, "Mike Chester" <mike at ...> wrote:
> >
> > I notice that 10 new Whitechapel bells with a tenor of 103cwt have
> appeared against Chester Cathedral on Dove.
> >
> > Kept this quiet! I assume that they are a chime for the central tower. Is
> this correct?
> >
> > Mike
> >
>
> 
>
           
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20110421/c55a4a74/attachment.html>


More information about the Bell-historians mailing list