[Bell Historians] van Aerschodt bell for sale

c.j.pickford.t21 at Oh3w-0H9tLOTQLdePr90fgUbVGx_rhw9dv5ItthmyJlx8zcw4sTB0cAbf1YqenVUvwgatd2H-WjV6mRopnGe5HQwcggH.yahoo.invalid c.j.pickford.t21 at Oh3w-0H9tLOTQLdePr90fgUbVGx_rhw9dv5ItthmyJlx8zcw4sTB0cAbf1YqenVUvwgatd2H-WjV6mRopnGe5HQwcggH.yahoo.invalid
Mon Aug 29 16:52:23 BST 2011


Am away - have been near Cattistock today! - but will look at this when home. But does the ebay stuff show any inscription or identifying marks?
I do have some info on bells supplied to UK destinations - and not all locations have been identified
The Lye bells aren't 1880 - they're undated, but probably cast in 1883 and hung in 1885 (from memory)
CP
Sent using BlackBerry® from Orange

-----Original Message-----
From: "Matthew Higby & Company Ltd, www.bellhangers.com" <matthewhigby at aol.com>
Sender: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:42:27 
To: <bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com>
Reply-To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] van Aerschodt bell for sale


Phil Gay pointed this one out to me a few days ago.

I don't think it is one of the Cattistock bells as according to Dalton's Dorset, only one of them (bell no 28) was dated 1880 (a recast) and this weighed only 0-1-5 in A - rather light for a 17" bell. Nearly all of the others had personalised inscriptions. The Lye are all dated 1880.

Cheers,

Matthew


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20110829/6a72fffb/attachment.html>


More information about the Bell-historians mailing list