[Bell Historians] Old Dove search

[Richard Offen]

No, simply says "unringable". In all previous editions there are no remarks after the bell details. 

R

Sent from Richard Offen's iPhone

On 22/06/2011, at 10:48 PM, Sue Marsden <erincaters at O31iH_V6TT5_pVp-QtzVRQRpvsHReHTl45LlAxD5X2zdQVV1_HmolMcFQP9cHaxKbeePwnNEzyP4KcdQiw200p_LkS4.yahoo.invalid> wrote:

> On 22 June 2011 15:40, Richard Offen <richard.offen at txh2IQdyh35NrOiKYI-pq2nii31S9BsnC-LRf2n90yt_xlKZPoz6Jgd-7tQkUoXHtdn3QBr-t43kEqs8pIyEZQ.yahoo.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> The 1968 edition of Dove is the first where they are shown as ‘unringable”.   Interestingly in the first edition, they are shown as a six.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Richard
> 
> Thanks. It doesn't give any more details as to why ie Tower Unsafe
> -was that recorded in the early editions? Dullingham are in a 6 bell
> frame (there were plans to augment early in the 20th C ) and there is
> a bell in a copula on top of the tower so that may be where the '6'
> came from.
> 
> SEM
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
>