[Bell Historians] Old Dove search

[Roderic Bickerton]

Ron's view of unringable was a bit eclectic. he 
took local information, but if he visited and 
managed, by hook or by crook to get them up they 
were reclassified as ringable.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Offen" 
<richard.offen at duIogw19pJRylXE1CeSpGCriK2i1sAW2DCxA8_ynFDPI4kLcrNPpPsTD-_Vh80dEx6pjqU1eCi1-Ro8jopwm9A.yahoo.invalid>
To: <bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 4:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Old Dove search


No, simply says "unringable". In all previous 
editions there are no remarks after the bell 
details.

R

Sent from Richard Offen's iPhone

On 22/06/2011, at 10:48 PM, Sue Marsden 
<erincaters at Wp_sgio3THYemr0ObW6EQKrAwQVhV-b0pFAyyJwdk3GYCYQYtZeKmJx7M9lwbLXFTN0RSTEk8PxujimhweUwedc.yahoo.invalid> wrote:

> On 22 June 2011 15:40, Richard Offen 
> <richard.offen at duIogw19pJRylXE1CeSpGCriK2i1sAW2DCxA8_ynFDPI4kLcrNPpPsTD-_Vh80dEx6pjqU1eCi1-Ro8jopwm9A.yahoo.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>
>> The 1968 edition of Dove is the first where 
>> they are shown as ‘unringable”. 
>> Interestingly in the first edition, they are 
>> shown as a six.
>>
>>
>>
>> Richard
>
> Thanks. It doesn't give any more details as to 
> why ie Tower Unsafe
> -was that recorded in the early editions? 
> Dullingham are in a 6 bell
> frame (there were plans to augment early in 
> the 20th C ) and there is
> a bell in a copula on top of the tower so that 
> may be where the '6'
> came from.
>
> SEM
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links