[Bell Historians] Re: Oldest Christian Bell
John Camp
camp at f-fqvDVDS2E77LhmNtP8tPUMesvMw6v11VMR6Jco9NqGxDN0WR_vNF2NLjj0fx1ia1K9NDPeqc5-McY.yahoo.invalid
Mon Aug 13 18:37:54 BST 2012
At 18:27 on 13 August 2012, Richard Smith wrote:
> John Camp wrote:
>> Possibly. But RAS's argument* is circular. It goes like this: Egbert
>> directed his priests to ring their church bells. How do we know?
>> Because he used the word "signa". Therefore "signa" means church bells.
> Quite the contrary. My point, though not terribly well
> argued, was that we cannot tell precisely what is meant.
I did say, in my footnote, that there might be other reasons for
thinking that it meant "bells", but your assertion, as it stood,
contained circular argument.
At 18:29 on 13 August 2012, Richard Smith wrote:
> Richard Smith wrote:
>> Egbert's phrase, 'ecclesiarum signa', is commonly translated
>> as '[of the] church bell'
> Sorry. That should be '[of the] church bells'. It's
> genitive plural.
"Signa" is nominative or accusative plural. It is "ecclesiarum" which
is genitive plural: "the bells of the churches".
John Camp
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list