[Bell Historians] Tower Classification required
alan Buswell firstname.lastname@example.org [bellhistorians]
bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Fri Apr 22 09:32:01 BST 2016
The purpose is to list and publish in my annual QP Report the quarters rung
on mini rings (not previously done until last year) as defined in the
Directory plus other towers not included in the list.
On 21 April 2016 at 12:17, Ted Steele bells at tedsteele.plus.com
[bellhistorians] <bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> On 21/04/2016 09:38, alan Buswell aaj.buswell at gmail.com [bellhistorians]
> Getting back to my original question,I will categorise a secular ring as a
> purpose built erection where it is unlikely that any religious service will
> take place in the future.
> But for which purpose? Ringing or secular ringing?
> Bells in churches will have been consecrated for sacred use. Are they not
> de-consecrated when no longer to be used for religious purposes? Is the
> difference between secular and sacred not simply a matter of whether the
> bells are considered to be consecrated?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Bell-historians