[Bell Historians] Cirencester (and Cambridge)

Richard Smith richard@ex-parrot.com [bellhistorians] bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Sat Jan 28 00:19:17 GMT 2017


'Chris Pickford' c.j.pickford.t21 at btinternet.com [bellhistorians] wrote:

> Cambridge tenor was definitely heavier. At the time of the 1911 restoration,
> it was weighed in at Loughborough as 29-0-23, leaving as 27-3-7.

Thanks.  I didn't have that weight.

RAS


------------------------------------
Posted by: Richard Smith <richard at ex-parrot.com>
------------------------------------


------------------------------------

Yahoo Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bellhistorians/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bellhistorians/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    bellhistorians-digest at yahoogroups.com 
    bellhistorians-fullfeatured at yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    bellhistorians-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
    https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/




More information about the Bell-historians mailing list