[Bell Historians] Cirencester (and Cambridge)
Richard Smith richard@ex-parrot.com [bellhistorians]
bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Sat Jan 28 00:19:17 GMT 2017
'Chris Pickford' c.j.pickford.t21 at btinternet.com [bellhistorians] wrote:
> Cambridge tenor was definitely heavier. At the time of the 1911 restoration,
> it was weighed in at Loughborough as 29-0-23, leaving as 27-3-7.
Thanks. I didn't have that weight.
RAS
------------------------------------
Posted by: Richard Smith <richard at ex-parrot.com>
------------------------------------
------------------------------------
Yahoo Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bellhistorians/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bellhistorians/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
bellhistorians-digest at yahoogroups.com
bellhistorians-fullfeatured at yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
bellhistorians-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list